The Liberals Plan to Turn Canada into a Marxist State

According to Stephane Dion; Stephen Harper will jeopardize Canada's economy by missing out on a new industrial revolution. Stephane Dion happens to be the leader of that same Liberal Party that claimed that Canada is the land of tomorrow, coincidentally a report came out from the Canadian Center for Policy Alternatives that concluded countries with higher taxes were happier then those with lower taxes. I see the correlation, the Liberals are planning to run a campaign for higher taxes & more social programs, not too capitalistic at all, in fact Dion is an admitted Marxist.

According to the report:

- lower rates of poverty; more equal income distribution, and more economic security for their workers; a higher GDP per capita; (in other words more taxes for the rich, no flat tax, & forcing every individual to suffer equally in poverty)

- higher rates of household saving and net national saving; (subsidized housing often leads to poor housing; just look at both the Communist & third world)

-greater innovation, including a higher percentage of GDP spent on research and development; (the United States leads the world in innovation, & research, & they are very capitalistic)

- a higher ranking on their growth competitiveness by the World Economic Forum; (The European Union serves an example of a stagnant economy with very little economic growth, including those Nordic countries this report praises)

- higher rates of secondary school and university completion; (1. when graduates enter the workforce the jobs aren't there & 2. too many courses in college & university have nothing to do with the real world)

- less drug use, more leisure time, and higher life satisfaction. (Vancouver's experiment with dope using booths is failing miserably since drug use has been on the increase. How is having more low end retail jobs making for better job & life satisfaction? Higher taxes deter industries that pay higher wages)

Similarly a report was recently published stating the exact opposite citing that capitalistic countries with lower taxes tend to have happier people with better lives, so it's no surprise that Dion & his Liberal supporters would use the advantage of a Canadian view to distort information painting Marxism in a bright picture detailing how great socialism is. The Liberal economist loses his credibility with statements such as the following statement:

"By cutting taxes, the Conservative government in Canada is headed in the wrong direction,” says Brooks. “It wants to make Canada more like the United States"

The United States is the most powerful economic engine of our time, without the United States Canada wouldn't have the economy we got, in reality poverty rates would be much higher, & Albertans wouldn't be a have province. The Liberals have moved too far to the economic left, & if Canadians don't send the message enough is enough, then the social programs that the left claims will end poverty will have the opposite effect. Marxism doesn't work!

Sources: Edmonton Sun

goodnewsnetwork

Progressive

Original Article: May 1, 2006
Edited for United North America: December 31, 2006

OK folks I admit I believe in the progression of society however the left have labelled me as regressive because I do not believe in their way as the Newspeak Dictionary of Liberalism concludes. And the reason why I am regressive; because I'm a border line so-con, which is an unfair assertion of Conservatives. So as a Conservative I support the progression of society by eliminating poverty, political reform, and I support the democratic union of nations, I look towards the stars to colonize new worlds, & I dream of the day when the world can come together in peace and evolve into a great civilization where thought can be logical with a greater understanding of the universe. However I don't view social programs, the excessive social change the Liberals want to enforce infringing on our liberties, & their version of a New World Order which democracy has no place.

But really is not a progressive someone who supports the progression of technology, and how society is run. After all it's only human nature to want change, or in many other scenerio's it can also mean protectorism. Look at Stephen Harper for example; the Liberals call him regressive because he does not support gay marriage, & the national daycare program. Harper believes in small government or at least I hope so, and hopefully as our society evolves beyond the hatred of the past; Canadians can begin the process of union with the United States & eventually the world of looking forward. But I guess only the Liberal progressive way is the only term that exists in today's Newspeak after all everything the Conservatives do is wrong and backward. From my understanding of regressive is that they look into the past and don't look forward.

So how is drug legalization progressive? That's something I can't get my heard around? After all substance abuse made against the law is a new concept, looking a mere couple of hundred years back smoking dope morons were allowed to smoke publicly, and anyone heard of the Opium Wars? Hello drug regulation and illegalization is a new concept, would not this be a regressive ideal? The same thing can be said about progressive religious values where the Bible's views are considered hate propaganda. And yet why is it that during the time of Christianity like no other civilized religion stability was introduced where man had a set of laws to follow. Before the ten commandments society was out of control, but as Liberals want to turn religion upside down; cities that value Liberalism are decaying into regressive area's showing traits of increasing violence with the resurgence of murder, rape, and robbery.

I guess that must be progress if you like big government, as history proves the ruling elites of the past such as the governing Kings, Emperors, and Dictators all had big governments. And as we are seeing today more big governments, tell me why are we regressing towards big government and not progressing to the American way of decentralization? It's far beyond me how Liberals think they are the progressives, but oh well I guess the left no capacity to realize just how backward they got it.

Today, A Dictator Meets His Maker

Last night Saddam Hussein was executed for war crimes :

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/saddam

Hopefully the insurgency will begin to fade, & the healing can now begin. Millions cried out for justice beyond the grave so for those who died at the hands of this vicious dictator justice be done.

My personal thanks to the Blogging Tories

OK folks we are now members of the Blogging Tories, for those who are pro Canada please do not take the statements literally on UNA for the intention of this movement is not about bashing Canada, the United States, & the crown but of a peaceful movement using democratic means of North American Unification. I like to send my personal thanks to Steve of Blogging Tories for allowing the alternative Conservative view of Republicanism as apposed to the American Tory, (monarchist), point of view rate here in Canada. And my thanks to Craig for the privilege of allowing me to supervise his Conservative Life Site, without that site I might not taken interest in Blogging Tories. Please take your time from the previous posts, & feel free to make your comments.

Thank You,

James

The tree is up, the stores were busy, & our pockets shrink with the delight of that good ole home cooking reading for that delicious turkey, with good the sweet smells of ll those cakes, pies, & other treats. And of course I can't forget that days before Christmas it's the time of year to take a sneak at your Christmas gifts. Yes folks it that time of year, the time to view my nephew joying with glee of his gifts rapidly & roughly removing that wrapping.

However Christmas is not all that joyful, so long as Mother nature played Scrooge with the lack of snow. Yea I know most people are just as happy without a white Christmas, but I can't help but think of that simple flake that coat the trees & our lawns of white gold. Indeed Christmas this year is for the Easter Bunny. Aside from Scrooges untimely visit this year, lets not forget the true meaning of Christmas, it's not the gifts, nor is it the weather, it's the spirit of giving, our hopes for a better world, & of family values giving hope that no one has to be alone during the holidays. So please be generous and may God bless you this Christmas.

What UNA is & what it is not

Many folks who have visited Jonathan Wheeler’s “ United North America” often have mis conceptions of the idea of North American unification. Mr. Wheeler has tried to push the UNA agenda on both sides of the Canadian & American border through local media sources on the radio & even an interview on television. I have personnel communication via Microsoft Messenger, & admittedly I had some of my own mis conceptions on the idea of United North America. Let me explain some of the mis conceptions both Americans & Canadians do have which seem to be relevant to the subject:

• UNA Supports the annexation of Canada into the union of the United States of America

• UNA is a Conservative agenda absorbing Canada as part of the right wing conspiracy

• UNA is about getting Canada out of the Commonwealth & dumping the monarchy

• UNA supports the proposed North American Union

All are untrue however to explain our position clearly:

1) UNA Supports the annexation of Canada into the Union of the United States of America

the following statement is untrue, though the site of United North America sounds like annexation the ideals Mr. Wheeler relates to the idea of a merger of Canada & the United States. UNA does not support annexation, when we talk about the idea we would be advocating that Canadians have no say, however that is not the intent of the movement, what we advocate for is giving the deserved amount of say as the population ratio dictates. Currently; Canada has only 10% of the combined population which is rather unfortunate, however using democracy as the model of the future model of a United North America it’s clear that the agenda of the movement must not only advocate for giving the population more say how the new union should be shaped. Part of our agenda is to displace the elites of both Canada & the United States, though we don’t support preventing elitists from running, it’s clear that the future model of governance must reflect the common man. That means that any future government must not be run strictly by a doctor, a lawyer, or a General, but by a farmer, a laborer, & a Private.

2) UNA is a Conservative agenda absorbing Canada as part of the right wing conspiracy

while many Liberals may lay claim that Conservatives want Canada to bring American Conservative values to Canadians, this is often to be unfounded. In reality there are Liberals who support the idea on both sides of the border, though it’s true that the vast majority on the Canadian side of the border that support United North America are Conservative, however looking at the monarchy issue the majority of supporters of that institution tend to lean right. Though there are more Liberals closed to the idea of United North America, coincidently they are also among the most pro Republican supporters in Canada; go figure!

3) UNA is about getting Canada out of the Commonwealth & dumping the monarchy

though there is no love lost over the monarchy, the idea is about simple economics, cultural similarities, common history, geographic location, & better governance.

4) UNA supports the proposed North American Union

UNA does not support the undemocratic North America Union proposed by North American elites. UNA supporters for the most part view the plan as means by the elites to gain power without the concession of the people of North America. Secondly Mexico is a poor country with too much corruption, which is consequently; far less developed. Under the plan of the North American Free Trade Zone Agreement leaning to the North American Union both Canadians, & Americans would be forced to pay equalization to bring Mexico up to par economically. The Transfer payment scheme already exists in Canada, & UNA supporters know the effects all to clearly, it’s our desire to end disparity, not to continue it, therefore it’s our position to completely oppose equalization in any form. Self sufficient economies are the way to go.

We here at United North America want an alternative plan to the current border which makes Canadians & Americans divisible, we acknowledge that such a plan to unify the continent is extremely difficult. However the supporters of United North America view this opportunity as worth while fight in order to bring the eventual unification of the world under a democratic government not run by the global elitists, but by the common man, you & me. So it’s no coincidence that UNA should serve as the model for many years to come.

The Patriot Pretender

Founder of the Council of Canadians, a few degrees to his name, an author, writer, and economist, Mel Hurtig spends his time bashing Conservative Canadians, & Americans. You would think that Mel Hurtig & the organization he started would spend more time improving Canada by fighting poverty, & advocating for government reform. However Mr. Hutag & his Council of Canadian thugs have had their evil eye on America for sometime blaming Canadian problems on Americans rather then looking into a mirror at ourselves. Mr. Hurtig's most recent report accused Stephen Harper of committing treason by working with President George W. Bush forcing Canadians into a contiental union with the United States & Mexico. However yet again Mr. Hurtig seems to waste his time claiming that President Bush wants to annex Canada despite the fact there are talks about securing both the Canadian & Mexican borders.

Looking through a time machine when Jean Chrietien & the Liberal Party heald power, was it not John Manley who was appointed by the current Prime Minister to work with the American government to bring Canada closer to the United States? Mr. Hurtig seems to ignore the fact that despite Mulroneys plan of NAFTA creating free trade, it was the Liberals who further intergrated Canada with the United States & Mexico. Looking further back to be fair with Mr. Bush the Democrats under Bill Clinton heald strong ties with Canada's Liberals, & both worked out the early process towards the so called North American Union idea.

Mr. Hurtig seems to be nothing but one of the Liberal Parties mouthpiece, it becomes obvious when he advocates using portions of the Canadian Constitution by claiming that Harper & the Conservatives should be removed from power via executive order of Queen Elizabeth /and/or Governor General Adrian Clarkson. (see article)

Pathetic! Mr. Hurtig has a deep hatred of Americans however if the issue was about forcing Canada into a union with a stronger monarch under the clutches of Great Britian, Mel Hurtig would waste no time selling out Canada's independence in a heart beat. Mr. Hurtig is no friend of Canada, nor is he a patriot, he's a backward loyalist from the Revolutionary era. Mr. Hurtig should issue an apology to all Americans & Canadian Conservatives, but I highly doubt it!